Nielsen MI Measures Off-Deck Mobile News Sites In Australia

by Sam Granleese on May 12, 2010

Nielsen has completed its first month of measuring a trial group of Australian mobile publishers in Market Intelligence, its site-side audience measurement tool. This is the first cohesive attempt at measuring off-deck mobile websites (non carrier related – i.e. Vodafone Live! or Optus Zoo).

The results look interesting, and will require some scrutiny in terms of calculating cookie deletion and unique audience – but is interesting to analyse nonetheless. The numbers are consolidated between devices (i.e. sites optimized for different handsets like Nokia or iPhone), they are not de-duplicated and the advertisers are currently limited to News Ltd, Fairfax, NineMSN (and Premier Media Group owned FoxSports).

I have summarised the first batch of monthly data below: ranked by monthly audience size and highlighting the stickiest or most engaging sites.

Nielsen Mobile April 2010 Average Time Per Unique Browser Table

News.com.au gained the largest audience for April, with just over a million unique browsers. However on average Fairfax news sites The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age had more user sessions per month for a longer average period of time. FoxSports is the stickiest mobile site, clearly catering to sports nuts who spent an average time of 42 minutes a month on the mobile site (though there are only 33,000 of them per month currently using the site).

There could be some debate as to why Fairfax’s news sites are stickier than News.com.au (audience or content or user-experience) and why people spend much more time on NineMSN than News.com.au (more video content?). At this stage we can only speculate and watch the monthly data roll in and average out a bit more.

View the image gallery below for today’s screenshots from the largest sites.

News.com.au - Mobile Homepage 12 May 2010 Sydney Morning Herald - Mobile Homepage 12 May 2010 The Age - Mobile Homepage 12 May 2010 NineMSN Mobile Homepage 12 May 2010 Nine News - Mobile Homepage 12 May 2010 FoxSports - Mobile Homepage 12 May 2010 NineMSN Wide World of Sports - Mobile Homepage 12 May 2010

There are obviously some big publishing names missing from this dataset, some who have large audiences (Google, ABC, Bigpond, CarSales.com, RealEstate.com.au) and some that are lagging behind in their mobile product in general (Yahoo!7). But it is a good starting point, and might surprise some people in terms of the size of audience and time spent with media some of these sites are not commanding.

Let’s hope that that more sites get on board over the coming months so we can start to get a less fragmented view of mobile audience measurement and invest appropriately in the medium.

URLs of the full list of mobile sites available after the jump.

m.news.com.au

m.foxsports.com.au

m.smh.com.au

m.theage.com.au

mobile.ninemsn.com.au

wwos.ninemsn.com.au/mobile

m.businessday.com.au

  • Great summary. I'd be interested to see research from the Australian consumer's perspective too. For myself, my top mobile bookmarks are NYTimes, BBC, Guardian, dabr.co.uk (Twitter app) and the ABC. The fact that just one of them is Australian is probably not too dis-similar to other consumers. Makes for a hell of a time for advertisers to pick the winners!

  • Good summary Sam.

    It would be interesting to see this in context with each of the publications non mobile version. ie. m.theage.com.au vs www.theage.com.au - especially the average session duration (given overall traffic to non mobile version would dwarf it's mobile counterpart).

    Further to this and in the the case of Fairfax and News Ltd, I wonder if it's possible (or feasible) to measure hard copy publication readership in the form of average # of articles or pages read per issue (or another better metric). I feel that distribution/readership figures alone just aren't a solid metric these days...

  • Hi Anthony - thanks for your feedback.

    I might do a follow up to this with regards to web browser vs mobile browser on fairfax vs news vs ninemsn etc. Though, the audience size is not that small as a % - news.com.au would be about 20% and the fairfax titles around about the same.

    Regarding publication readership, not a lot of good studies are done unfortunately - even sections of a newspaper are not audited for readership separately (let alone auditing page numbers/articles).

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Iron Man 2 Movie – Mobile Ad Campaign

Next post: Fairfax’s Drive.com.au Mobile Dilemma